Meta-analysis finds small-bite closure cuts incisional hernia risk after laparotomy
This meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (2617 patients) compared small-bite (5-mm) versus large-bite (10-mm) fascial closure techniques following midline laparotomy. The authors report that small-bite closure reduced incisional hernia risk by 43-69% depending on assessment method, with benefit persisting beyond 2 years of follow-up, and was also associated with reduced surgical-site infection and total complications, though closure time was slightly longer with no differences in seroma, fascial dehiscence, or pain scores.
Most relevant for: Patients undergoing midline laparotomy and surgeons performing fascial closure after abdominal surgery.
Read the original at British Journal of SurgerySummary written by an AI model from the source text and dated by the source's publication date. Check the original before acting on it. How MedFollow selects and summarizes updates.
Informational only. Not medical advice. Not a substitute for clinical judgment. Always consult current guidelines and your own clinical judgment.
Specialties
More surgery updates
- No ventilator-free day benefit from prone positioning or HFOV in PARDSOct 31, 2026
- Liver Transplant Outcomes for cHCC-CCA Rival Those for HCCOct 30, 2026
- Meta-analysis finds no clear ED efficiency gain with 0/1h MI pathwayOct 29, 2026
- Left Bundle-Branch Pacing Outperforms RV Pacing in AV Block TrialOct 28, 2026
- First-Line IVF Outperforms IUI in Unexplained Infertility TrialOct 27, 2026