Episiotomy type linked to differing anal sphincter injury risk in operative delivery
A secondary analysis of the MFMU APEX cohort examined the association between episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury (third- or fourth-degree lacerations) among 5,277 patients undergoing operative vaginal delivery. The study reported that episiotomy overall was associated with higher odds of sphincter injury, but effects varied by type and delivery history: mediolateral episiotomy was associated with lower odds of injury in patients without a prior vaginal delivery, while midline episiotomy was associated with higher odds of injury during vacuum-assisted delivery regardless of vaginal delivery history. The authors state these findings are consistent with prior studies and suggest further investigation is warranted to identify patients who might derive benefit from mediolateral episiotomy before operative vaginal delivery.
Most relevant for: Patients undergoing vacuum- or forceps-assisted vaginal delivery, particularly those without a prior vaginal delivery.
Read the original at Obstetrics & GynecologySummary written by an AI model from the source text and dated by the source's publication date. Check the original before acting on it. How MedFollow selects and summarizes updates.
Informational only. Not medical advice. Not a substitute for clinical judgment. Always consult current guidelines and your own clinical judgment.
Specialties
More gynecology & obstetrics updates
- RFA for Fibroids Linked to Higher Treatment Failure Than MyomectomyOct 13, 2026
- ACOG updates guidance expanding opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer preventionOct 1, 2026
- Systematic Review Finds Doula Support Linked to Better Birth OutcomesOct 1, 2026
- Giredestrant-Everolimus Improves PFS in Pretreated Breast CancerOct 1, 2026
- Meta-analysis: Balloon Cervical Ripening Not Linked to Higher Uterine Rupture Risk in TOLACSep 29, 2026